Author: admin

Categories
Purely Moronic

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Courtesy of The New York Times, “The following is the full text of the resignation letter by Mark Pomerantz, who had investigated former President Donald J. Trump, but left after the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, halted an effort to seek an indictment.”

Dear Alvin,

I write to tender my resignation as a Special Assistant District Attorney and to explain my reasons for resigning.

As you know from our recent conversations and presentations, I believe that Donald Trump is guilty of numerous felony violations of the Penal Law in connection with the preparation and use of his annual Statements of Financial Condition. His financial statements were false, and he has a long history of fabricating information relating to his personal finances and lying about his assets to banks, the national media, counterparties, and many others, including the American people. The team that has been investigating Mr. Trump harbors no doubt about whether he committed crimes — he did.

In late 2021, then-District Attorney Cyrus Vance directed a thorough review of the facts and law relating to Mr. Trump’s financial statements. Mr. Vance had been intimately involved in our investigation, attending grand jury presentations, sitting in on certain witness interviews, and receiving regular reports about the progress of the investigation. He concluded that the facts warranted prosecution, and he directed the team to present evidence to a grand jury and to seek an indictment of Mr. Trump and other defendants as soon as reasonably possible.

This work was underway when you took office as District Attorney. You have devoted significant time and energy to understanding the evidence we have accumulated with respect to the Trump financial statements, as well as the applicable law. You have reached the decision not to go forward with the grand jury presentation and not to seek criminal charges at the present time. The investigation has been suspended indefinitely. Of course, that is your decision to make. I do not question your authority to make it, and I accept that you have made it sincerely. However, a decision made in good faith may nevertheless be wrong. I believe that your decision not to prosecute Donald Trump now, and on the existing record, is misguided and completely contrary to the public interest. I therefore cannot continue in my current position.

In my view, the public interest warrants the criminal prosecution of Mr. Trump, and such a prosecution should be brought without any further delay. Because of the complexity of the facts, the refusal of Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization to cooperate with our investigation, and their affirmative steps to frustrate our ability to follow the facts, this investigation has already consumed a great deal of time. As to Mr. Trump, the great bulk of the evidence relates to his management of the Trump Organization before he became President of the United States. These facts are already dated, and our ability to establish what happened may erode with the further passage of time. Many of the salient facts have been made public in proceedings brought by the Office of the Attorney General, and the public has rightly inquired about the pace of our investigation. Most importantly, the further passage of time will raise additional questions about the failure to hold Mr. Trump accountable for his criminal conduct.

To the extent you have raised issues as to the legal and factual sufficiency of our case and the likelihood that a prosecution would succeed, I and others have advised you that we have evidence sufficient to establish Mr. Trump’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and we believe that the prosecution would prevail if charges were brought and the matter were tried to an impartial jury. No case is perfect. Whatever the risks of bringing the case may be, I am convinced that a failure to prosecute will pose much greater risks in terms of public confidence in the fair administration of justice. As I have suggested to you, respect for the rule of law, and the need to reinforce the bedrock proposition that “no man is above the law,” require that this prosecution be brought even if a conviction is not certain.

I also do not believe that suspending the investigation pending future developments will lead to a stronger case or dispel your reluctance to bring charges. No events are likely to occur that will alter the nature of the case or dramatically change the quality or quantity of the evidence available to the prosecution. There are always additional facts to be pursued. But the investigative team that has been working on this matter for many months does not believe that it makes law enforcement sense to postpone a prosecution in the hope that additional evidence will somehow emerge. On the contrary, I and others believe that your decision not to authorize prosecution now will doom any future prospects that Mr. Trump will be prosecuted for the criminal conduct we have been investigating.

I fear that your decision means that Mr. Trump will not be held fully accountable for his crimes. I have worked too hard as a lawyer, and for too long, now to become a passive participant in what I believe to be a grave failure of justice. I therefore resign from my position as a Special Assistant District Attorney, effective immediately.

Sincerely,

Mark F. Pomerantz

The Pomerantz letter is just more proof that my First Axiom always holds! Recall, First Axiom of Political Science for Presidents: Ain’t no president or ex-president ever going to be convicted of a crime or go to jail — ever. We get the government we deserve. Oh, well. Welcome to stupid America!

Categories
Other

Send Russian Mothers Their Sons’ Ashes

CNN

From CNN, “The governor [Vitaly Kim] has called for the bodies to be placed into refrigerators and sent back to Russia for identification through DNA testing. But, a month into the war, it is still unclear how or if the remains of soldiers are being repatriated to Russia, where reports about the death toll have largely been silenced.”

Yeah. So, no! I’ve commented on this before, but I think Ukraine needs to start ramping up the psychological warfare against Russia a bit. Ideally, any Russian soldier that dies in battle should be allowed to disappear into the great Ukrainian blackhole. That is to say, Russian bodies do not get repatriated to the motherland. No, no! These treasures of Russia’s youth and blood should be forever lost — somewhere in Ukraine. Families at home must forever feel incomplete and empty knowing that sons, brothers, and fathers left for war and never returned. Oops! Sorry, I meant to say “special military operation” because that makes all the difference.

If Ukraine really, really feels the “humanitarian” need to send something back to Russian families, then they can send a bag of ashes. Not a particular soldier’s ashes to the family, but just a collection of ashes from a mass funeral pyre. They can even send a little note along with the bag reassuring the family that their loved one is probably somewhere, in part at least, among these ashes — possibly. Chances are good, but not great. Russia decided to send its military into the Ukrainian meat grinder. So be it! What goes in whole comes out masticated. Don’t expect fallen soldiers to come back. Ukraine has to go full-on psychological torture against Russia and nothing less. Russia started the war, but Ukraine must finish it — dirty if need be!

Categories
In My Legal Opinion RepubliKKKlans

SCOTUS Hates Black Voters

Did I get your attention? Of course, I only mean the conservative justices hate Black people, especially Justice Thomas, who is the conservatives’ token flaky biscuit maker — because you know he works in the house, right? And if he wants to stay in the house, then he needs to keep those field workers in their place. I’m just saying. But I digress. An article in Slate describes today’s SCOTUS decision on a voting rights case in Wisconsin. Before providing quotes and my commentary, allow me to advocate Slate for its legal analysis. They ably provide layman commentary on essential matters before SCOTUS. It is a good source for those seeking elucidation of heady legal topics.

From the article, “On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued an astonishing decision throwing out Wisconsin’s new legislative districts as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The majority accused a Republican justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court of greenlighting a ‘racial gerrymander’ by creating one more majority-Black district in the State Assembly. Wednesday’s unsigned decision, issued through the shadow docket, hands Wisconsin Republicans an unexpected victory in their quest to reduce Black representation in the legislature. It also alters the law of redistricting in fundamental yet cryptic ways that might, to a cynic, seem designed to disadvantage Democrats in every single case. … The real victims, of course, are Black Wisconsinites who will now have less influence in the state legislature. But once again, it is hard not to feel a bit of sympathy for the lower court judges, too. Hagedorn did his job commendably; he applied precedent fairly, to the dismay of his own party; and yet he still got brusquely reversed on the shadow docket in a nonsensical, unsigned opinion. It seems there is only one way a lower court can spare an election-related ruling from the SCOTUS shredder: bend any rules necessary to ensure a Republican victory.”

I quoted the first and last paragraphs because they sum up the issue well. It will help if you read the entire article to understand the problems with the SCOTUS opinion so that I won’t go into the specific points here. Suffice it to say, this Wisconsin case is yet another example of SCOTUS hellbent on giving RepubliKKKlans permanent political control, especially in swing states. It is somewhat ironic that the Court is so intent on ensuring race is not a factor in districting that they would deprive minorities of the opportunity to retain equitable protection under the law. Suddenly, the conservative justices are entirely color blind while allowing the white majority to suppress equal representation of minorities in Wisconsin.

What is the ultimate point I’m trying to make? Maybe this lawyer joke will enlighten my thinking. A man needs the answer to a problem: What is 2 + 2? First, he goes to a mathematician, who pulls out his calculator and replies, “The answer is 4.” Next, he goes to an accountant, who pulls out a spreadsheet and states, “The answer is 4.” Last, the man goes to a lawyer to ask, “What is 2 + 2?” The lawyer replies, “What do you want it to be?” The Supreme Court of the United States wants to suppress minority voting rights, so they will make any argument and rule in any way to ensure that it happens. It’s what they want it to be. When the conservative justices show you who they are, believe them. All I can do is keep screaming about the tectonic change that SCOTUS is about to unleash on America, hoping that people will finally wake the f*** up, but I sense people can’t be bothered. I will reiterate my prior iterations: SCOTUS is coming for your rights. Oh, well. You heard it hear first. Welcome to stupid America!

Categories
Dumbass Democrats Politics Purely Moronic RepubliKKKlans

Two Data Points: One Conclusion

First, The Hill quotes Howard Stern, “‘I hate to say it, but only 65 percent of Americans are fully vaccinated [against COVID-19], and I can’t help but think the wackos [RepubliKKKlans] are winning,’ Stern said Wednesday. ‘Ever since Trump won the Republican nomination, the whole Republican Party’s gone bonkers.’” Second, also from The Hill, “President Biden’s approval rating dropped to 40 percent this week, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll, an all-time low for the president in that survey. The survey showed that Biden had a 54 percent disapproval rating amid high inflation and tensions caused by Moscow’s deadly invasion of Ukraine, according to Reuters. … Broken down by party, 77 percent of Democratic respondents approved of Biden’s job in office compared to 10 percent of Republicans and 27 percent of independents, Reuters added.”

Stern is absolutely correct: RepubliKKKlans are winning. They are winning public sentiment and thus the political argument. He points to the vaccination rates as a relevant proxy for the hold RepuliKKKlans have on messaging for just about everything. The other proxy is Biden’s continuing drop in approval ratings. In particular, two aspects are simply incomprehensible to me. One, Democratic approval is only 77 percent. Un-f***ing-believable! Even when traitor trump was at his worst, he still had RepubliKKKlan support in the mid- to high-80 percent range. Yet, dumbs Democrats, being as dumb and irritable as they are, fail to stick by their guy. Whatever! I give up.

Two, the Independents’ approval of Biden is basically at the same level as RepubliKKKlans. I seriously have no f***ing clue why Independents are so f***ing upset. Is it because of inflation? Probably. This is when the stupidity of Americans shines. Blaming Biden for high prices is like blaming God for the rain. It just happens! Biden has no control over the vast workings of the economy and prices. Whatever Biden may do (executive orders and releasing strategic petroleum reserves) in response to inflation is just for show, knowing that America is too stupid to understand any better. But no matter what he does or fails to do, dumbass Americans will blame him anyway. Not to mention this inflationary period is due to a robust economy. But, whatever. People don’t want to hear it. The only thing morons of America understand is, Prices high! Prices bad! Economy no good! Biden bad!

As for Biden’s handling of Russia’s war on Ukraine, he is unquestionably, without a single doubt, doing an exemplary job while trying not to trigger the next world war. Although I wish NATO et al. would do more and while I routinely scorn the West for their professional hand-wringing instead quicker actions, I understand the tight rope these leaders are walking with Putin. Anyone who thinks Biden is not handling the Ukraine crisis at least well enough is a m*****f***ing G.D. moron of the highest f***ing order. And you’re probably a traitor, too!

So, Biden is in a predictable no-win situation with the war and the economy. Yet, dumbass Democrats and Independents seem hellbent on making sure Biden is crippled in the opinion polls just in time for the next elections (midterm and presidential). They may as well roll out the red carpet for traitor trump and RepubliKKKlans. Oh, well. We get the government we deserve, and if the majority of the population is a bunch of jejune, petulant morons, then you can pretty much guess what kind of government is in the waiting. We’re f***ed. The numbers show it! And Stern is right! Welcome to stupid America.

Categories
Evil Evangelicals MAGA Morons Politics Purely Moronic RepubliKKKlans

Traitor Fugitive

Traitor Evan Neumann

According to The Hill, “Belarus granted refugee status to Capitol riot defendant Evan Neumann, according to Belarusian state-run media, which circulated a photo of him apparently holding country documents. ‘US citizen Evan Newman [sic] received refugee status in Belarus. The document was handed to him in the Department of Citizenship and Migration of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Brest Regional Executive Committee on March 22, 2022,’ the Belarusian Telegraph Agency reported on Twitter.”

Um, yeah. If you have to run to an enemy nation to protect yourself from insurrectionist charges, then you are the definition of a traitor and a fugitive, just like every other RepubliKKKlan, MAGA moron, evil evangelical, and QAnon kook. All these people are traitors to America, without exception. You guys should feel free to abscond to Russia! You people are not wanted here in America!

Categories
Evil Evangelicals In My Legal Opinion MAGA Morons Purely Moronic RepubliKKKlans

They’re Coming for Your Straight Marriage Next

According to nwi.com (Times Media Co. of Northwest Indiana), “U.S. Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., would welcome the U.S. Supreme Court rescinding its 1967 ruling that legalized interracial marriage nationwide in favor of allowing each of the 50 states to decide such issues on its own. Speaking Tuesday on a conference call with Indiana reporters, the Hoosier senator unambiguously declared his belief that many of the high court’s key civil rights decisions of the past 70 years were wrongly decided and an improper usurpation of state’s rights. … But, when asked by The Times, Braun admitted there are many Supreme Court decisions he believes improperly established federal rights that would be better handled on a state-by-state basis, including Loving v. Virginia that legalized interracial marriage, and Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) establishing a right to privacy concerning contraceptive use.”

I was literally just writing about this the other day. Look, f***tards! These articles fall in my lap, so to speak. Seriously, I peruse my regular news sources, and these types of articles stand out. It is not a coincidence that when I write about RepubliKKKlans coming for your rights, suddenly, as if right on cue, RepubliKKKlan lawmakers start popping up to express their support to turn back the right of interracial marriages and birth control. I don’t know how many times I have to tell all you f***tards out there: This new SCOTUS will start stripping everyone’s rights. RepubliKKKlans are already planting the seeds for everything they want the high court to begin reversing — abortion rights, gay marriage, interracial marriage, birth control, privacy in your bedroom is just for starters, off the top of my head.

This state’s rights movement spearheaded by conservatives will be a disaster for America. Think about marriage, for example. What happens when SCOTUS declares interracial marriage should be left to the states to decide? The U.S. Constitution only mentions race once (and marriage not at all), thusly: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Given the conservative makeup of SCOTUS, which now subscribes to originalism as their primary legal, philosophical doctrine, if it ain’t exactly written into the Constitution, then it ain’t protected. So, don’t think race and marriage are explicitly protected rights. They are not! In fact, the underlying right that justices have long inferred as being in the Constitution is the right to privacy (and liberty) which derives from the Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment (see substantive due process and here [And, yes, I read all of it.]); this is the fundamental right that justifies gay marriage, interracial marriage, abortion, birth control, sodomy (for the gays only, of course), and other unenumerated rights. But with this ultra-conservative SCOTUS, that basic underpinning is under threat because, again, the right to “privacy” is not explicitly enshrined in the Constitution. In short, the conservative wing of SCOTUS wants to shred the substantive due process doctrine, which is the linchpin to underdoing federal protection of privacy rights. So, if privacy is not in the Constitution, then it’s up to the states to determine what constitutes “your right to privacy.” Yeah, good luck with that! For a segment of the country — RepubliKKKlans, MAGA morons, evil evangelicals, and QAnon kooks — that abhors the notion of government being in their business, they sure are eager for the business of SCOTUS to ensure state governments can do just that — get up in their private business. Whatever! I live in stupid hell!

All the right-winger nutjobs need is one old-school evil evangelical to refuse to grant a marriage license to an interracial couple because doing so would violate that person’s First Amendment right, as was the case before Loving, where the Bible was used to justify banning such marriages. I could see such a case going to SCOTUS and Justice Thomas writing the majority opinion that would deny his own interracial marriage, but that would be par for the course for all conservatives; they are more than willing to shoot themselves in the foot as long as they can tell everyone else beneath them how to live their lives.

Then watch as all the blue states make interracial marriage legal while all the red, racist states make it illegal. So now, when interracial married couples travel to a red state, their marriage is suddenly no longer recognized. Part of the reason this country works — I use the term loosely — is that states have implicitly agreed to abide by some standard norms, but with RepubliKKKlans gunning for 50 individual nation-states, America is headed toward 50 waring — literally — neighbors sooner rather than later. RepubliKKKlans, MAGA morons, evil evangelicals, and QAnon kooks genuinely want a country divided along red and blue lines, where the red states can simply ignore any rights from blue-state visitors if they even allow such travel across state lines. Ultimately, this is where we are headed with this ultra-conservative theocratic-friendly SCOTUS; leave everything up to the states. The federal government only exists for national defense, regulating interstate commerce, and taxation. Honestly, you morons are seriously suffering from a lack of imagination when it comes to the future of America under this SCOTUS.

Mark my words! You may think I’m hyperbolic, but I see the signs; they are not concealed. RepubliKKKlans are not being shy about their intentions. But whatever! No one cares because it’s SCOTUS. People will only start caring when it’s too late. This is what happens when a society becomes apathetic and dumbed down. Your rights are next. Oh, well. You heard it hear first. But enjoy your rights while you can, and welcome to stupid America!

Categories
Evil Evangelicals MAGA Morons Purely Moronic RepubliKKKlans

‘Why Conservative Parts of the U.S. Are So Angry’

From the titled article (above) in Yes!, “Decades of political decisions and policies have created a massive and growing chasm between the economic and social disaster unfolding in small-town and rural parts of the United States, and the prosperity and safety of cities and suburbs. Many of those successful urban and suburban areas have reaped the rewards of electing largely moderate, competent Democratic leaders. Meanwhile, rural areas have elected Republicans drawn from a party that is increasingly incompetent, corrupt, and willing to engage in outright racism to win elections. … This is not simply an urban–rural divide. For the largest urbanized states, the three with Democratic control of all branches of government (California, New York, and Illinois) had GDPs per capita vastly higher than the three biggest Republican-controlled states (Texas, Florida, and Ohio). … Surveys and studies consistently find Trump’s generally older, White supporters enraged at ‘loss of status’ and in fear of being ‘replaced’ by non-White people. That White people are falling behind across key economic, health, and safety indexes is not due to victimization by immigrants and liberal conspiracies, however, but to victimization by other Whites and self-inflicted alcoholism, drug overdose, and suicide. … Yet, despite these gains, White voters vehemently rejected Democrats in successive elections. Today, Trump’s base voters are electing candidates who share their racial resentment and imagined victimization, not those who actually are advancing their safety and economic well-being.”

There never seems to be an end to these types of compositions that reaffirm a manifest conclusion of the state of the RepubliKKKlan Party: All conservatives — RepubliKKKlans, MAGA morons, evil evangelicals, and QAnon kooks — suffer from white privilege grievance syndrome. We have finally achieved critical mass in stupid America, where white grievance determines how people vote and how politicians attract their voters. None of this is new, but what is novel is that white grievance is the overwhelmingly and singularly driving force of white voters. They would rather live in a state of poverty and turpitude than recognize that the days of protestant white straight cis men ruling over everyone else are over. Rather than coming to terms with the notion of an ever-changing and ever-progressing world, they want to drag America back to the 1850s. It is a lamentable commentary on a country that is more interested in looking backward than forward. Whites would cut off their nose despite their face without thinking twice if they thought it was a way to keep the minorities — people of color, the gays, women — in their place, which is well below in the social order and supplicant to white folk! To all those aggrieved RepubliKKKlans, MAGA morons, evil evangelicals, and QAnon kooks, I say this: F*** your feelings! Welcome to stupid America!

Categories
In My Legal Opinion Purely Moronic

What Have I Been Saying for Years?

From an article in The Atlantic titled “Stop Waiting for Trump to Get Convicted” by Paul Rosenzweig, “Attorney General Merrick Garland is not going to save democracy. Nor is the attorney general of New York, Letitia James; the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg; nor the Fulton County district attorney, Fani Willis. As the apparent collapse of the New York district attorney’s investigation makes clear, criminal cases are hard to make. Donald Trump, despite his many seemingly criminal acts, is unlikely to ever spend a day in jail. Observers of the Trump malignancy have an unfortunate habit of wish casting—believing that their most optimistic fantasies will become reality. They did this with the Mueller investigation—remember ‘It’s Mueller Time’?—and they did it with both of Trump’s impeachments. Their dream has always been that somehow, somewhere, someone would call Trump to account for his actions and, in doing so, save American democracy.”

Bingo! Again, I have to remind readers of my First Axiom of Political Science for Presidents, which states: Ain’t no president or ex-president ever going to be convicted of a crime or go to jail — ever. This is a strong axiom; there are no exceptions or in-between instances. How the axiom is stated covers all and every possible case. In fact, the axiom is so strong it really should be considered a political science law. Nonetheless, it is refreshing to read another person’s opinion that reflects my neophyte knowledge — though not so naive. Of course, the article reminds me of all the moronic pundits who keep advising patience and that justice is coming. Christ! Kill me now!

The most notable f***tards include, in no particular order, Neal Katyal, Joyce Vance, Jill Wine-Banks, George Conway, Glenn Kirschner, and Michael Cohen. These are regular lawyers who make the rounds on liberal cable and radio shows who constantly try to convince audiences that traitor trump is about to go down, that AG Garland is close to bringing a case against traitor trump, that the New York and Georgia cases are closing in on traitor trump. They have been peddling some version of impending traitor trump doom since the Mueller investigation — another ending I predicted correctly, namely that nothing would ever happen. Mueller was always destined to fail. Every time these pundits speak, I am convinced more and more just how f***ing stupid they truly are. For a bunch of alleged experts on the law and the legal system, they clearly have no f***ing clue. The only progressive lawyer who has always remained unconvinced that traitor trump will be held accountable is Elie Mystal. He is the only one who cannot be fooled, and he warns others not to be fooled either. Mystal is one intelligent man! The rest just need to STFU. It’s the First Axiom, stupid! Welcome to stupid America!

Categories
Dumbass Democrats RepubliKKKlans

What the F***!?!?

From The Hill, “Liberal Reps. Ilham Omar (Minn.) and Cori Bush (Mo.) were the only two Democrats to vote against a House measure blocking an end to oil imports from Russia. … Omar’s vote in part reflected her views that blocking Russian oil could lead the U.S. to rely more on and strengthen ties with Saudi Arabia. Progressives are critical that the Biden administration has not more forcefully pushed human rights in the Kingdom out of concern it would harm U.S. and Saudi security and energy cooperation. This includes holding off sanctions on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman over the killing of U.S.-based journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018; the jailing of dissidents and political opponents, in particular women, and Riyadh’s role in civilian deaths in Yemen’s civil war. Progressives also see humanitarian differences between how the U.S. and allies are responding to the deadly conflict in Ukraine and the ongoing strife in the Arab world. Liberals have for years called for an end to America’s role in the Saudi-Yemen battle.”

What the f***!?!? You’re kidding me, right? How is this possible? How!?!? I will not be a hypocrite, and I cannot abide such a blatant double standard, so I must throw these two into the same traitor category as other RepubliKKKlans. It saddens me that these two dumbass Democrats cannot see the forest for the trees regarding Ukraine, the security of the West, and democracy. And let’s not conflate the issues of Saudi Arabia and Russia. To be sure, Saudi Arabia is a bad actor; they always have been, but they are not destabilizing the world order and democracy. The most pressing and immediate concern before us today is Putin’s Russia. Any vote against crippling Putin is unacceptable. This is not the time to start justifying bad votes with false equivalencies and what-about-isms.

Categories
International Indigestion

Israel in Bed with Putin

From Haaretz, “The State of Israel is exceptional among Western countries in that it has refrained from sharply condemning and imposing sanctions on Putin and the circle around him that are responsible for the war. … Israeli officials’ statements have, for the most part omitted the identification of who is actually attacking Ukraine, committing crimes against the Ukrainian people and against the stability of the international order. As if it were a natural disaster or an alien invasion from another planet. … Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ‘helped’ Putin upgrade his internal repression tactics, while spending time flattering him. … For example, every year on October 7, Netanyahu joined the queue of leaders of former Soviet republics calling Putin to congratulate him on his birthday. Netanyahu was so proud of their association that he put up giant election posters of himself and Putin side-by-side under the slogan ‘Netanyahu. A different league.’”

What an embarrassment! For a country that was literally founded as a result of genocide, the State of Israel would rather not take a stand against genocide happening in Ukraine at the hands of Russia. But what would one expect from a country that kept Putin-loving Netanyahu in office for 12 years? Astonishingly, a country born out of the ashes of a world war that fought one dictator — Hitler in case you’re not paying attention — continues to be in bed with another dictator — Putin in case you’re brain dead. Of course, this is all consistent with the likes that Israel has sucked up to in the past — traitor trump in case I have to spell out everything for you f***tards. Netanyahu, Putin, traitor trump. They are all of the same ilk, and it seems that Bennett is a bit squishy himself. Shame on Israel! Seriously! For a nation that claims never to forget, they seem to have amnesia.