Sorry, but she lost me a while ago. At this point, I really don’t care what happens in Georgia. She’s been stringing us along for seven months now. I have no confidence in a person who has no f***ing clue what the definition of “imminent” is. Back in January, she claimed in open court that indictments were imminent. No dictionary in the world would define soon as being seven-plus months in the future. I would expect a prosecutor to use precise language; she does not. Moreover, she claimed that her office was “ready to go.” But now she’s calling more people into the grand jury to testify, presumably to clinch a true bill. Again, I’m sorry, but her language is sloppy at best and stringing us along at worst. I would think for anybody, “ready to go” means that the indictment has already happened, and now it’s just a matter of conveying it to the judge and making the arrest. But she still hasn’t nailed a verdict. She’s been crying wolf for months, and I’m over it.
And this move to re-enforce the security around the court building is more over-the-top showmanship. We’ve been through three other indictments of traitor trump with barely a ripple of protests. So, I have no idea why she thinks there will be an uprising by Georgians on this matter. Sorry, but Willis has been more ringmaster at the circus than anything else. What will happen will happen, but I’ve lost interest, for in the end, the state charges — contrary to what others are predicting — are the least consequential, even though no president can pardon traitor trump’s state crimes. He’s never going to jail. And if, by some miracle of God, he gets convicted, it’s already been made pretty evident that voters have no issue with a criminal president running the county (into the ground). And if the Fulton County case is still pending while he’s president, then I have absolutely no doubt that SCOTUS will pause the prosecution because, make no mistake, too many on the High Court believe traitor trump is above the law. State sovereignty be d*mned. They will claim the president cannot be expected to do his job of running the country and be under prosecution at the same time. They will further argue that his election win is vindication by the voters as to his innocence or, at the very least, the will of the people to delay prosecution until after his term. And you know what? It’s difficult not to see how that argument holds water. Indeed, the idiots of America would have spoken — they want the criminal in charge. Oh, well. Mark my words, f***tards. Welcome to stupid America!