The Fire Madison Cawthorn PAC filed an ethics complaint with the House that included the touching picture above. They further annotate the image with the following: “They are seen in this video, which was distributed on Twitter among various people, discussing suggestive subjects and touching inappropriately.” Really? Suggestive subjects? Inappropriate touching? I don’t mean to cum to the defense of Cawthorn, but what exactly could be suggestive and inappropriate about two consenting adults doing as they please as long as they are not breaking any laws? Of course, the intimation is that the two are gay lovers. I guess they are breaking “God’s” law.
But I will renew my original, longstanding question: Does Cawthorn have a working tallywacker? He is a paraplegic, which may or may not include “little” Cawthorn. Does he give “soft” porn a new meaning? Curious minds want to know. Of course, it is beyond ironic that fellow RepubliKKKlans who wish to out Cawthorn from office are trying to out Cawthorn. Naturally, there is no more egregious act or more offensive immutable characteristic as homosexuality. As the saying goes: RepubliKKKlan accusations are really just projection. They do exactly what they charge others of doing, and that is why you have super-bro Cawthorn inveighing against the gays as he and his not-so-secret boy-who-is-a-friend (cousin actually) Stephen Smith share their lives on social media and in the workplace as it would appear. They are oddly inseparable even for kissing cousins. Just more RepubliKKKlan hypocrisy. Welcome to stupid America. Now, with soft porn!