According to The Hill, “Supreme Court justices are slated to delve into disputes surrounding abortion during their final session this year, revealing the legal battlefronts forming in the wake of the high court’s stunning decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Several key cases are headed to the justices. One is Idaho’s emergency request to fully enforce its abortion law, a ruling that is possible as soon as this week. At the justices’ Friday conference, they are scheduled to consider whether to take up an appeal seeking to overturn a Supreme Court precedent allowing laws that ban anti-abortion activists from approaching people outside abortion clinics. And at next week’s conference, the justices are slated to review whether to take up the dispute over the availability of mifepristone, the common abortion pill, which they will take up at a Dec. 8 closed-door conference. … In the matter of establishing abortion clinic ‘buffer zones,’ the Supreme Court 23 years ago ruled 6-3 that the First Amendment permitted a Colorado law prohibiting anti-abortion activists from protesting or counseling within eight feet of someone entering an abortion clinic. With most of those justices no longer on the bench, that precedent may now be on the chopping block.” Add to this list the Texas case that was argued before that state’s supreme court and you have a continued, full-on attack against women’s rights to control their own bodies. And to that, I say: Oh, well. Let them die!
Indeed, maybe women need to die. For the tens and tens of people who actually read my online, open-air therapy sessions, they will understand that I say what I mean and I say it plainly. I’ve been saying more women need to die since the end of Roe, not because I’m a misogynist or a masochist, but because this is the only way to move society. Death sells — usually — and apparently, no one pays attention unless — and until — the body count reaches some undetermined and amorphous tally. Although I will say in regards to gun control laws and the Second Amendment, there is no death tally high enough to dislodge people’s love affair with guns. I assume that the death toll of women from abortion-related healthcare will also be pretty f***ing high before voters act or care, if ever or at all. Again, as I say repeatedly: Abortion rights are always someone else’s problem. Society was completely asleep at the wheel for the years — nah, decades — leading up to the end of Roe. RepubliKKKlans were on a 50-year mission to undo the ruling, while Democrats and others were doing this: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. So, these people brought it on themselves, but RepubliKKKlans are not done yet, and there is no way women are going to get anything that resembles nationwide protection of abortion rights for at least a generation (or two). Morons of America really f***ed themselves over when they elected traitor trump and allowed him to solidify a supermajority, uber-conservative SCOTUS for the next 20 years.
So RepubliKKKlans are on a mission — hand in hand with SCOTUS — to ban all abortions federally as well as ban contraception. In the meantime, SCOTUS will start rolling back other protections where they can, such as in this Idaho case. What could possibly go wrong when SCOTUS suddenly finds that women seeking abortions can be accosted and perhaps physically prevented (or sufficiently intimidated) from entering healthcare establishments, all in the name of the First Amendment? This is where we’re headed, f***tards. What are the consequences? A return to the bad old days when coat hangers were the abortion tool of choice. Unfortunately, no one cares until people start dying — in public. Sadly, morons of America simply are too apathetic to do anything until the bottom falls out of society. So, for the sake of saving society, more women need to die because that’s where we are in this sh*t-for-brains nation. Welcome to stupid America, where death sells, and everything else is just background noise to be ignored.